PowerRadar.us investigation
Signe Viimsalu, Terje Kriiseman and the 5,000-euro taxpayer-money complaint
A user-submitted complaint from www.sudzibas.lv/ raises disputed public-interest questions about Signe Viimsalu, Terje Kriiseman, Estonia’s Insolvency Service, public bankruptcy proceedings, taxpayer money, proportionality, and whether state-funded action was justified in a reportedly hopeless old bankruptcy matter.
Legal and editorial notice
PowerRadar.us publishes public-interest commentary, investigative questions, opinion, analysis, whistleblowing material, and requests for clarification under U.S. law and First Amendment free speech principles.
No official, public figure, company, institution, or private person discussed on this website is presented as guilty of any crime, civil wrong, ethical breach, corruption, tax evasion, misuse of power, or unlawful conduct unless and until such a finding has been made by a competent court or legally authorized authority.
The purpose of this article is to present reasonable doubt, documented public-interest questions, and matters that may deserve public scrutiny, journalistic inquiry, institutional response, or whistleblower attention. Statements should be read as allegations, questions, commentary, interpretation, or opinion unless expressly identified as established court findings.
Source: www.sudzibas.lv/
User-submitted complaint: The following text is translated from a user-submitted complaint. PowerRadar.us does not verify, endorse, adopt, or take legal responsibility for the factual claims, opinions, interpretations, or allegations contained in user submissions. Persons and officials discussed are presumed not guilty unless and until a competent court or lawful authority determines otherwise. The submission may be disputed, contested, incomplete, subjective, or factually inaccurate.
Signe Viimsalu, Terje Kriiseman — unprofessional, incompetent burners of taxpayers’ money
I was a member of the management board of a company that developed a tax debt in 2019. The Tax and Customs Board issued a liability decision and filed a bankruptcy petition against me as a natural person. I had to go through a debt-release procedure. Nevertheless, I also decided to delete that problematic company through bankruptcy proceedings and filed a bankruptcy petition so that the court would remove it from the register by compulsory procedure.
Under the law, before bankruptcy proceedings lapse, the matter must pass through the Competition Authority, which decides whether to conduct public proceedings at the state’s expense. Unexpectedly, in June 2024, Terje Kriiseman and Signe Viimsalu from the Competition Authority decided to process the bankruptcy matter through public proceedings.
The bankruptcy trustee received roughly 5,000 euros from the taxpayer’s pocket for one or two months of work. In addition, they decided to file claims — against whom exactly? Against a brother going through personal bankruptcy? On what basis? On the same debt for which a liability decision had already been made? Does this mean trying to collect the same debt a second time?
Before the Competition Authority intervened and began burning taxpayers’ money, the court had asked me for a report on the causes of insolvency.
This was a five-year-old debt. The Tax and Customs Board had already issued a liability decision for it, which under the Taxation Act practically excluded filing a claim against a management board member. Even more so, I was personally bankrupt. Since the matter was five years old, there were also no realistic possibilities for recovery actions, as the temporary bankruptcy trustee had already informed the court.
In other words, the bankruptcy proceedings were so hopeless and pointless that, for objective reasons, nobody had even paid a deposit for the bankruptcy trustee’s work. Only our state, which apparently has plenty of money, allocated 5,000 euros for the bankruptcy trustee’s work for one or two months. And the state continues to burn money without limit, because apparently the state has plenty of money.
Why was it necessary to spend approximately 5,000 euros of taxpayers’ money on work that nobody needed? Why is the Insolvency Service even needed at all?
The answer is simple: to hire ugly, envious, incompetent people who cannot do anything anywhere else and pay them generously from tax money for work that nobody needs. These are the hardworking achievers of our state: Terje Kriiseman and Signe Viimsalu.
One more attentive observation: if you send them an application or complaint, they answer practically the next day. And the person answering is none other than Signe Viimsalu herself, the head of the service. This means the head apparently has absolutely nothing else to do if she can immediately reply with a long letter to every application the next day.
Right of reply, correction, and context
PowerRadar.us invites documented corrections, counterevidence, right-of-reply statements, and clarifications from any person or institution named in this article. If credible documentation changes the factual context, the article may be updated, corrected, expanded, or annotated.
Public officials and state-linked watchdogs exercise public power. PowerRadar.us therefore treats questions about official accountability, real estate, company reporting, tax transparency, conflicts of interest, selective enforcement, and public-money use as matters of legitimate public concern. That scrutiny is not a verdict. It is the function of free speech, public oversight, and democratic accountability.
Readers should independently evaluate the documents, official records, institutional responses, and available evidence. PowerRadar.us does not encourage harassment, threats, doxxing, or unlawful conduct against any person discussed on this site.
Comments: 0